EPSDT Care for Kids logo

 

EPSDT Care for Kids Newsletter

___________________________________________________________ 
Fall 2010

Early Identification of Learning Disabilities

Tammy L. Wilgenbusch, PhD
Pediatric Psychologist,
University of Iowa Children’s Hospital

Mother reading to child

Rather than waiting for indications of trouble to become major problems, the field of learning disabilities today focuses on early identification and prevention. In the 1970s and 1980s, learning disabilities (LD) were defined by the discrepancy between achievement and intellectual ability. This led to a stringent use of test scores, with arbitrary cutoff points determining diagnoses. Focusing only on a discrepancy often results in delayed treatment as these discrepancies often don’t show up until middle elementary school, past the optimal time for adequate development of skills required for reading and math.

Recently, the focus has shifted to identifying and providing early treatment and prevention in younger children who may be at risk for LD. In younger children, neurocognitive skills and learning patterns are still developing, leading to great variability in skills. This makes testing somewhat difficult. For children younger than 6 or 7 years old, screening for risk of learning difficulties and global delays is most reliable. Therefore, evaluation of LD at this age should focus on specific prerequisite skills and not necessarily a full neuropsychological evaluation.

Most research on LD in children in early elementary school has been on reading. New research indicates that the best time to screen and start treatment to prevent reading LD is in kindergarten or early 1st grade. In addition to screening at school, it is helpful when primary care physicians also screen these children for learning difficulties, enabling parents to use early intervention resources. Young boy practicing rhyming words

Specific skills in kindergarten and first grade that are predictive of later reading skills include:

  • Phonological awareness (knowledge of the auditory patterns and structure of language)

  • Phonological memory

  • Graphonomic knowledge (knowledge of the relationship between printed letter and sounds)

  • Letter knowledge

  • Picture naming and vocabulary

  • Rapid automatic naming

Tasks that can help assess these skills include a child's ability:

  • Identify rhymes

  • Tap the number of syllables or phonemes heard in a spoken word

  • Blend sounds together to generate a word

  • Delete a sound to form a new word

In addition, basic alphabet identification and rapid naming of letters can be a good screen for these difficulties.

Children with difficulties in the prerequisite skills of reading are at risk for developing reading disabilities as they progress through school, and need additional, specific instruction in kindergarten and first grade.

The three key components of instruction for children at risk for reading disabilities are:

1

Instruction is very systematic and explicit,
typically using a phonics based approach. 

2

Instruction is intensive, with many learning opportunities throughout the day.

3

Instruction is supportive, and includes positive feedback, encouragement, and the scaffolding of skills.

For these younger children with LD, school is the best referral source. Parents seeking additional support may wish to obtain private testing and screening by a psychologist.

In addition to achievement based LD, children may have difficulties not related to a cognitive delay that interfere with their overall classroom learn­ing and performance. For example, children with attention or memory problems may have difficulty following directions at school, leading to more global academic concerns.

When determining whether middle elementary to high school students are dealing with learning difficulties, physicians can ask questions regarding problems with work completion, not turning in assignments, inability to do well on timed tests, difficulty following directions, poor reading fluency, and difficulty with comprehension or test performance. If children are having these types of difficulties, regardless of achievement scores, further neuropsychological testing can be helpful to identify underlying strengths and weakness that can help in the development of intervention and strategies to help improve overall academic success.

While not all children need neuropsychological testing to determine whether there is an underlying neurocognitively based learning difficulty, testing is warranted when children do not respond to early prevention or basic instruction. This testing should focus on a variety of cognitive skills and identify patterns of strength and weakness.

In the Division of Pediatric Psychology at the University of Iowa Children’s Hospital, neuropsychological testing focuses on the skills of verbal comprehension, expressive language, visual-spatial-motor skills, memory, attention, and processing speed. The goal is to gain an understanding of the child’s strengths and weaknesses so that specific accommodations can be recommended to parents and teachers. Neuropsychological testing is valuable because it goes beyond academic performance, providing providing specific information that can guide intervention, rather than focusing strictly on overall scores.

In summary, it is important to screen young children, starting in kindergarten, for specific prerequisite skills that lead to adequate development of academic skills, particularly reading. Neuropsychological testing at this age can be helpful for identifying skills that should be monitored or for global delays, but specific neurocognitive learning disabilities are difficult to identify due to the wide variability of children’s behavior and skills. After a child reaches 6 or 7 years of age, or if more global or broad learning concerns are noted, referral for neuropsychological testing may be warranted to assist with the development of specific interventions and school accommodations for the child.

Resources

Fletcher, JM et al. (2002). Assessment of reading and learning disabilities: A research-based intervention oriented approach. J School Psychol, 40, 2763. doi: 10.1016/S00224405(01)000930.

Torgesen, JK (2002). The prevention of reading difficulties. J School Psychol, 40, 726. doi:10.1016/S00224405(01)000929.

Return to Fall 2010 Index

_______________________________________________________________________________

EPSDT Care for Kids Newsletter | EPSDT Care for Kids Provider Web Site

Copyright, ©The University of Iowa, 20102012